A foundation for fairness: the Criminal Procedure Act

The significance of the Act lies in its movement away from a conventional, confession-driven method that has been criticized for depending on statements frequently given under duress or without legal assistance.

Featured Image

Shazma Thaufeeq

2025-11-13 18:17:43

The Maldives Criminal Procedure Act, Law No. 12/2016, brought significant changes to the country’s legal system. This law, which took effect in 2017, serves as a blueprint for the criminal justice system. It governs every step from when a crime is suspected to the end of a trial. It pursued the country's democratic reforms of 2008 and the introduction of the new Penal Code in 2015. Collectively, these laws aim to modernize the system and strengthen the rights guaranteed by the constitution. 

The significance of the Act lies in its movement away from a conventional, confession-driven method that has been criticized for depending on statements frequently given under duress or without legal assistance. It sets up a more robust, evidence-centric framework. For the first time, all parts of the criminal process are clearly outlined, providing much-needed clarity, standardization, and accountability for law enforcement, prosecutors, and the judiciary. 

The core philosophy: shifting to evidence and due process 

Before the Criminal Procedure Act, procedural rules were spread across various Supreme Court regulations and changing court decisions. This left gaps for judicial and police decision-making. The Criminal Procedure Act stabilized these rules and aligns them with the strong human rights protections in the 2008 Constitution. 

One of the key regulations of the Act is to protect the rights of the accused from the beginning. This is particularly evident in the rules about statements and confessions. The Criminal Procedure Act states that a confession is usually not allowed in court unless it is made voluntarily before a judge by an accused person who is mentally sound. This safeguard against forced confessions is the most important reform introduced by the Criminal Procedure Act. This ensures investigators rely on solid, verifiable evidence, such as forensic science, digital evidence, and witness testimony, rather than only the suspect’s statement.   

The Act details each phase of the proceedings, making sure that justice is served fairly and transparently. It specifies the requirement to provide the accused with all case documents and outlines how to separate charges for different offenses.

Investigative procedures and judicial oversight 

The Criminal Procedure Act alters how enforcement authorities, mainly the Maldives Police Service, exercise their powers by requiring judicial oversight for nearly every invasive action. 

  • Arrest, Detention, and Rights: 

The Act sets strict conditions for arrest and detention, removing the previous practice of indefinite or arbitrary detention. Authorities must have reasonable grounds to believe a person has committed or is about to commit a crime prior to making an arrest. 

Primarily, the Act requires that after an arrest, the detained person must be quickly informed of their rights and the reasons for their arrest. Any questioning must follow after these rights are clearly established. 

Additionally, the Criminal Procedure Act places a time limit on the police to bring the arrested person before a judge to confirm the legality of the detention. This guarantees that imprisonment is only applied when it is absolutely required, such as to prevent the accused from tampering with witnesses, destroying evidence, or escaping. This also ensures authorities aren’t detaining someone for an extended period of time without filing charges. 

  • Search, Seizure, and Surveillance: 

The Criminal Procedure Act clearly outlines the procedures for search and seizure. Generally, law enforcement must get a court warrant based on reasonable cause before searching private property or seizing assets. This provides a vital protection against unreasonable invasions of privacy. 

The Act also addresses modern investigative tools, such as monitoring bank accounts, freezing assets, and overseeing private communications. By regulating these tools, the Criminal Procedure Act ensures that the government's ability to conduct thorough investigations which does not violate the citizen’s right to privacy, requiring judicial approval for most intrusive actions. 

Streamlining prosecution and trial 

Through the implementation of structured pre-trial procedures and the enforcement of strict time restrictions, the Criminal Procedure Act seeks to enhance the historically lethargic pace of Maldivian justice.

The fundamental of timeframes for charges and investigations is a crucial component. Investigations must be completed by law enforcement within predetermined timeframes, and the case file must be sent to the Prosecutor General's Office for charging. This is vital to put an end to the protracted delays that previously resulted in suspects being either uncharged or detained indefinitely. 

The Prosecutor General's Office has a well-defined role in managing charges. In order to promote more equitable trial administration, the Criminal Procedure Act establishes precise guidelines for filing charges, managing joint charges, and amending or withdrawing charges. 

Plea agreements and conditional cautions are examples of contemporary procedural instruments that were legally introduced under the Criminal Procedure Act. 

  • Plea agreements: This opens a window to plead guilty in exchange for a recommendation for a lighter sentence. It is a key process for judicial efficiency, saving court time and resources simultaneously encouraging the accused to admit guilt. 
  • Conditional cautioning: For minor offenses, the Prosecutor General's Office can issue a caution instead of pursuing charges; however, the offender must need to meet specific conditions, like attending counseling or making reparations. This supports curative justice and reduces court congestion. 

The Preliminary Hearing is another key step in the process. This is the step where the accused formally responds to the charge, while the judge(s) decides if there is sufficient evidence for a case, and if so, trial dates and procedures are set. This ensures cases proceed to trial only when there is sufficient proof to support the charge, avoiding impractical cases thus saving court’s resources. 

Challenges and the path forward 

Although the Criminal Procedure Act is a significant move toward strengthening the rule of law, its implementation has faced many challenges similar to any such process. 

One immediate effect was that law enforcement struggled to adjust to the new evidence requirements. Since they could no longer rely solely on confessions, conviction rates fell at first. This showed the need to improve the technical and forensic capabilities of police and investigative agencies. A comprehensive training program for officers, forensic specialists, and prosecutors is critical to effectively collect, manage, and present scientific evidence in court. 

Additionally, judges, police officers, and attorneys were unfamiliar with the new procedures, which caused delays in the first rollout and the necessity for later revisions. Trust and collaboration between the Prosecutor General's Office, the Maldives Police Service, and the courts are critical to the effectiveness of the Criminal Procedure Act. Enhancing professional development and completing the rules required to properly implement the Act are the main goals of ongoing work.

The Criminal Procedure Act is a dynamic law that has already undergone a number of revisions to enhance its procedures, such as modifications to court warrant procedures for witness protection and travel limitations, which are essential for dealing with major offences.

This Act displays the nation’s commitment to a justice system that respects rights. It brings structure, enforces accountability, and provides a framework to ensure that everyone, receives a fair and timely process based on evidence, not coercion. Its future success relies on building strong institutional capacities and the steadfast dedication of the Maldives’ judicial and law enforcement agencies to its core principles.