The Maldives Criminal Procedure Act, Law No. 12/2016, brought
significant changes to the country’s legal system. This law, which took effect in
2017, serves as a blueprint for the criminal justice system. It governs every
step from when a crime is suspected to the end of a trial. It pursued the
country's democratic reforms of 2008 and the introduction of the new Penal Code
in 2015. Collectively, these laws aim to modernize the system and strengthen
the rights guaranteed by the constitution.
The significance of the Act lies in its movement away from a
conventional, confession-driven method that has been criticized for depending
on statements frequently given under duress or without legal assistance. It
sets up a more robust, evidence-centric framework. For the first time, all
parts of the criminal process are clearly outlined, providing much-needed
clarity, standardization, and accountability for law enforcement, prosecutors,
and the judiciary.
The core philosophy: shifting to evidence and due process
Before the Criminal Procedure Act, procedural rules were spread
across various Supreme Court regulations and changing court decisions. This
left gaps for judicial and police decision-making. The Criminal Procedure Act stabilized
these rules and aligns them with the strong human rights protections in the
2008 Constitution.
One of the key regulations of the Act is to protect the rights of
the accused from the beginning. This is particularly evident in the rules about
statements and confessions. The Criminal Procedure Act states that a confession
is usually not allowed in court unless it is made voluntarily before a judge by
an accused person who is mentally sound. This safeguard against forced
confessions is the most important reform introduced by the Criminal Procedure
Act. This ensures investigators rely on solid, verifiable evidence, such as
forensic science, digital evidence, and witness testimony, rather than only the
suspect’s statement.
The Act details each phase of the proceedings, making sure that
justice is served fairly and transparently. It specifies the requirement to
provide the accused with all case documents and outlines how to separate
charges for different offenses.
Investigative procedures and judicial oversight
The Criminal Procedure Act alters how enforcement authorities,
mainly the Maldives Police Service, exercise their powers by requiring judicial
oversight for nearly every invasive action.
- Arrest, Detention, and Rights:
The Act sets strict conditions for arrest and detention, removing
the previous practice of indefinite or arbitrary detention. Authorities must
have reasonable grounds to believe a person has committed or is about to commit
a crime prior to making an arrest.
Primarily, the Act requires that after an arrest, the detained
person must be quickly informed of their rights and the reasons for their
arrest. Any questioning must follow after these rights are clearly established.
Additionally, the Criminal Procedure Act places a time limit on the
police to bring the arrested person before a judge to confirm the legality of
the detention. This guarantees that imprisonment is only applied when it is
absolutely required, such as to prevent the accused from tampering with
witnesses, destroying evidence, or escaping. This also ensures authorities
aren’t detaining someone for an extended period of time without filing charges.
- Search, Seizure, and Surveillance:
The Criminal Procedure Act clearly outlines the procedures for
search and seizure. Generally, law enforcement must get a court warrant based
on reasonable cause before searching private property or seizing assets. This
provides a vital protection against unreasonable invasions of privacy.
The Act also addresses modern investigative tools, such as
monitoring bank accounts, freezing assets, and overseeing private
communications. By regulating these tools, the Criminal Procedure Act ensures
that the government's ability to conduct thorough investigations which does not
violate the citizen’s right to privacy, requiring judicial approval for most
intrusive actions.
Streamlining prosecution and trial
Through the implementation of structured pre-trial procedures and
the enforcement of strict time restrictions, the Criminal Procedure Act seeks
to enhance the historically lethargic pace of Maldivian justice.
The fundamental of timeframes for charges and investigations is a
crucial component. Investigations must be completed by law enforcement within
predetermined timeframes, and the case file must be sent to the Prosecutor
General's Office for charging. This is vital to put an end to the protracted
delays that previously resulted in suspects being either uncharged or detained
indefinitely.
The Prosecutor General's Office has a well-defined role in managing
charges. In order to promote more equitable trial administration, the Criminal
Procedure Act establishes precise guidelines for filing charges, managing joint
charges, and amending or withdrawing charges.
Plea agreements and conditional cautions are examples of
contemporary procedural instruments that were legally introduced under the
Criminal Procedure Act.
- Plea agreements: This opens a window to plead guilty in exchange for a recommendation for a lighter sentence. It is a key process for judicial efficiency, saving court time and resources simultaneously encouraging the accused to admit guilt.
- Conditional cautioning: For minor offenses, the Prosecutor General's Office can issue a caution instead of pursuing charges; however, the offender must need to meet specific conditions, like attending counseling or making reparations. This supports curative justice and reduces court congestion.
The Preliminary Hearing is another key step in the process. This is
the step where the accused formally responds to the charge, while the judge(s)
decides if there is sufficient evidence for a case, and if so, trial dates and
procedures are set. This ensures cases proceed to trial only when there is
sufficient proof to support the charge, avoiding impractical cases thus saving
court’s resources.
Challenges and the path forward
Although the Criminal Procedure Act is a significant move toward
strengthening the rule of law, its implementation has faced many challenges
similar to any such process.
One immediate effect was that law enforcement struggled to adjust
to the new evidence requirements. Since they could no longer rely solely on
confessions, conviction rates fell at first. This showed the need to improve
the technical and forensic capabilities of police and investigative agencies. A
comprehensive training program for officers, forensic specialists, and
prosecutors is critical to effectively collect, manage, and present scientific
evidence in court.
Additionally, judges, police officers, and attorneys were
unfamiliar with the new procedures, which caused delays in the first rollout
and the necessity for later revisions. Trust and collaboration between the
Prosecutor General's Office, the Maldives Police Service, and the courts are
critical to the effectiveness of the Criminal Procedure Act. Enhancing
professional development and completing the rules required to properly
implement the Act are the main goals of ongoing work.
The
Criminal Procedure Act is a dynamic law that has already undergone a number of
revisions to enhance its procedures, such as modifications to court warrant
procedures for witness protection and travel limitations, which are essential
for dealing with major offences.
This
Act displays the nation’s commitment to a justice system that respects rights.
It brings structure, enforces accountability, and provides a framework to
ensure that everyone, receives a fair and timely process based on evidence, not
coercion. Its future success relies on building strong institutional capacities
and the steadfast dedication of the Maldives’ judicial and law enforcement
agencies to its core principles.