The President of the Anti-Corruption
Commission (ACC), Adam Shamil, stated today that the budget allocated to the
ACC for the coming year is insufficient to allow the institution to fully
execute its legal responsibilities.
Speaking at a meeting of the
Parliament’s Budget Review Committee, Shamil pointed out that the budget set
for the ACC for next year is even lower than its allocated budget ceiling.
The ACC's budget ceiling was MVR 49.8 million. However, the budget book, however, allocates MVR 47.4 million
for the ACC for the coming year.
Shamil revealed that the "New
Policy Initiative" included in the budget covers a project that was ranked
only as the third priority among those submitted by the commission, with an
expenditure of just MVR 200,000.
He explicitly stated that the
allocated budget is not adequate to fulfill the duties mandated by Article 21
of the ACC Act.

Shamil detailed that 97 percent of the
ACC's budget for next year is allocated to staff salaries, benefits, and office
administrative costs. This leaves only 3.4 percent, which is MVR 1.6 million for direct
programs aimed at fulfilling the commission’s responsibilities.
"Looking at the commission's
overall baseline budget, 78.3 percent (MVR 37 million) is for staff salaries and
benefits. After that, we will face significant difficulties in conducting
investigations and fulfilling responsibilities mandated by law, given the
geography of the Maldives. Only 0.3 percent (MVR 130,000) has been allocated in
the budget for investigative travel," he explained.
Shamil also highlighted the high
cost of rent, which currently consumes 10 percent of the budget which is MVR 4.8 million. He
mentioned the commission made considerable efforts to reduce the rental
expense.
He voiced serious concern that the
ACC is currently operating out of a residential building, which is unsuitable
for such an institution. Operating in a public residential building makes it
difficult to ensure the safety and privacy of individuals summoned for
investigations or information gathering.

"Even when people are summoned,
not as suspects but just to clarify information, the way the location is set up
often makes it appear in public and in the media as if they are being treated
as criminals. Anti-corruption commissions in other countries are often run
similar to police departments," he argued.
The ACC President expressed concern
that staff are working in very cramped spaces, necessitating immediate
solutions.
"I believe that the
Anti-Corruption Commission should absolutely not be operating in a public
residential home. The arrangements should be such that we can carry out our
work more effectively. For instance, at the moment, we do not have control over
people entering and exiting," the ACC President added.